Skip to main content

VIDEO ASSISTANT REFEREE (VAR): Good or harmful to football?

 

FEATURES

VIDEO ASSISTANT REFEREE (VAR): Good or harmful to football? - FCNaija
Antonio Conte was right. Referee Graham Scott made a ‘big mistake’ by not taking advantage of the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) as Chelsea struggled to a penalty shootout win over Norwich in a third round replay in the FA Cup.
Maybe it wasn’t so much of a ‘big mistake’ that he chose not to use the VAR before booking Pedro for that awful dive, but it was surely a monumental mistake not to have used the technology the penalty calls involving Willian and Alvaro Morata.
Of course Chelsea won the game, but the discussion right now could easily have been different had they failed to beat Norwich. For all the criticism of the VAR, it has also proven a useful tool for referees – a typical case being Kelechi Iheanacho’s goal against Fleetwood Town just the day before.
In his reaction to the incidents, Conte said: “If we want to use a new system, I cannot accept a big mistake. In this case, the Willian penalty was a big, big mistake. Not from the referee on the pitch, but from the person watching the game (Mike Jones, the VAR at Stockley Park).”
The Italian manager said again: “The situation was very clear. I watched it and this is a penalty. Very clear. The referee took quickly a decision to book Willian.
“That means you don't have doubt. You must be sure, 100 per cent. And, despite this, there is another person checking the situation.
“If the person checking the situation calls you and says it's a penalty, you say you made a mistake, take back the yellow card and give the penalty.”
Morata may have gone a bit overboard with his reaction after being booked for what the referee perceived to be an overreaction, but if he had consulted the VAR, he would have seen, without any shadow of doubt, that the Spain striker had been pulled, and thoroughly deserved a penalty.
On same occasions, the VAR has proven a very controversial instrument, and former Newcastle United striker Alan Shearer couldn’t hide his disgust.

So where then do we go with the technology? Use it or bin it?
It’s really a tough one to say, with differing views on how helpful or not it has been to football and questions continue to arise on whether it has come to stay in football. Maybe it needs some time for people to get used to it
whats your take

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Coffee Raising Your Cholesterol Level?

RESEARCHERS at the Wageningen Agricultural University, in the Netherlands, say that drinking unfiltered coffee will raise your cholesterol level. The crucial word is “unfiltered.” Why? Research Reports, a newsletter from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, says that coffee beans contain a cholesterol-raising substance called cafestol. When hot water is poured directly on the ground coffee, the cafestol is extracted. The same is true when finely ground coffee is boiled in water several times, as it is in Turkish coffee, or when a metal filter is used instead of a paper filter, such as in a French press. Without a paper filter, the cafestol ends up in the brew. One unfiltered cup of coffee, which may contain up to four milligrams of cafestol, can cause the cholesterol level to rise by about 1 percent. Espresso also contains cafestol, since it is made without a paper filter. However, its cholesterol-raising effect is less if you use a demitasse. Less espresso, less c...